Sunday, October 22, 2017

Of Soul Food and Baptist Confessions of Faith

Now, therefore, take I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and catch for me game; 4and make for me dainty meats, such as I love and bring in to me, that I may eat,—To the end my soul may bless thee, ere yet I lie!" (Gen. 27:3-4)

Isaac wanted SOUL food.  The terms "soul" and "spirit" have become so intertwined and convoluted that most do not know the difference.  Even Charles Spurgeon used the wrong word when he stated in the Baptist statement of faith that at death,
"The bodies of men after death return to dust, and undergo corruption, but their souls, which neither die nor sleep, having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God Who gave them.

The scripture reference from Ecclesiastes 12:7 states that it is the SPIRIT, not the soul which returns to God.  There IS a difference.  

Christianity has made the soul immortal, when the scriptures state in Ezekiel 18:20 that the soul that sinneth, shall die.

Isaac, thinking he was near death, wanted comfort.  That is what "soul food" does.  It comforts, appeals to the senses, etc.  and that, is how the scriptures use the term "soul" figuratively.  "Soul" pertains to the senses, to emotion, to the flesh.

Look at the difference between "soul" and "spirit" as described by Paul.  In the KJV and many other translations, "natural" is the word you read, but it is actually the Greek word for "soul".  Check out the passage from 1 Corinthians 15, below in the Rotherham version:

"It is sown a body of the soul, it is raised a body of the spirit; if there is a body of the soul, there is also of the spirit:— 45 Thus, also, it is written—The first man, Adam, became, a living soul, the last Adam, a life-giving spirit. 46 Howbeit, not first, is the [body] of the spirit, but that, of the soul,—afterwards, that of the spirit. 47 The first man, is of the ground, earthy, the second man, is, of heaven: 48 As, the man of earth, such, also, the men of earth, and, as, the man of heaven, such, also, the men of heaven; 49 And, even as we have borne the image of the man of earth, let us also bear the image of the man of heaven. 50 And, this, I say, brethren,—that, flesh and blood, cannot inherit, God’s kingdom. Neither doth, corruption, inherit, incorruption." (1 Cor. 15:44-50)


Worship songs, sermons, etc which elicit an emotional (soulish) response are many times miscalled "spiritual", when they are actually appealing to the emotions and the flesh.

No, Jesus Did Not Preach More About Hell, Than Heaven

G3772-heaven (?)
G86 hades (4)
G1067 Gehenna (11)


There is the very popular (and completely incorrect) saying that hellfire and brimstone preachers have used for years, saying, "Jesus talked more about Hell than He ever talked about Heaven."

Let's see.

The gospel accounts in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are where we will find the words of Christ Jesus.  Now, even allowing for the horrible translation of a word (hades) which means "grave" into the word "hell", and the word "Gehenna" which is a valley, south of Jerusalem (not a place, 9 miles under the ground), we'll see the tale of the tape.

Jesus Christ used the two different words that were translated as "Hell", a grand total of 15 times!  Wow!  That is a LOT of times.  Surely, the Lord didn't mention "heaven" that many times.  I mean, a preacher SHOULD know, right?

Well, after the book of Matthew, I ceased my count.  That means that I didn't bother counting the number of times Jesus talked about heaven in the books of Mark, Luke, and John.  The Lord had used the word for Heaven, over 70 TIMES, JUST in the book of Matthew.

So, if any teacher says, "Jesus talked more about hell than he talked about heaven", you now can verify; that is utter nonsense...and you might just want to check behind that teacher on other things too.

By-the-way, the word "Ge-henna" which Jesus Christ said 11 times means "Ge" (Valley/ravine/ditch) of "Hinnom" (a proper noun/a man's name) and no occurrence of this word in the Old Testament is ever translated as "Hell".  When the Hebrew characters for "valley" and "Hinnom" are used in the Old Testament, it turns out that it is translated as "valley of Hinnom".

"Hades" which He said 4 times, is "the grave/the unseen/".  

When one is dead and in the grave, one is unseen because they are covered up and buried.  Did you know that the Old English word "hel" (which is part of the word "helmet") means "to cover".

"And, I also, unto thee, say—Thou, art Peter,—and, upon this rock, will I build my assembly, and, the gates of hades, shall not prevail against it." (Matt. 16:18) ROTHERHAM

Given that Christ Jesus is the Firstborn from among the dead and the firstfruits of resurrection to immortality, it makes sense that "Hades" means "the grave" and not some subterranean torture chamber.

There is only one verse in the New Testament in which "Hades" appears and the KJV translators, correctly rendered it as "grave".

"O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?" (1 Cor.15:55)


I am convinced that they only rendered it as "grave" in this single verse because to render it as "hell" in THIS verse would wreck their theology.

Is God Rational? A Search for Truth

A friend and I were talking about God and His purposes yesterday.  We are about the same age and we talked about how we NEED things to make sense.  God created man with an inherent sense of right and wrong (see Romans 2:14); a conscience.  We have a yearning for justice and bristle against unfairness.  Why?  We are made in God's image.  So, when things don't make sense to us; especially at a theological and philosophical level, our God-given intuition sounds an alarm bell.  "DANGER!!! DANGER!!! SOMETHING WRONG HERE!!!

As a teenager, growing up in a Southern Baptist church, I simply accepted things as "oh, well, it doesn't make sense but that's just how it is."  This was being lazy on my part and deciding to ignore the red flags my intuition and gut instinct were throwing up in front of me.  I did not understand how someone's "free" will could thwart the will of God.  But I assumed that it MUST be so because the preacher in front of me kept preaching about God giving man free will.  So, that HAD to be in the Bible, right?  I didn't understand how if God was the Potter and He molded vessels of honor and those of wrath, how it was the person's credit or detriment as to how they turned out.  That, "free" will thing again.  I didn't understand and it made no sense that a person who grew up not having ever believed because they never heard of Jesus was sent to "hell" upon death OR that one who never heard of Jesus went to heaven upon death out of ignorance (I heard preachers who would argue for one or the other view).

Acts 17 speaks of the Bereans and how they were more noble than the believers in Thessalonica.  The Bereans didn't just shrug their shoulders and accept things at face value.  They searched the scriptures to see for themselves if these things were so.

Some questions we have MAY be a mystery to us even after searching the scriptures.  This is certainly true as to WHY for example, God chooses one individual to be made a vessel of honor, while He chooses another to be made a vessel of wrath.  It is His sovereign choice and the reason is not given to us.  BUT, we are told that He will be merciful on ALL (Romans 11:32).  We are told that the same ALL who were given a death sentence due to Adam's disobedience are the SAME ALL who will receive justification to life because of Christ's obedience.  These things CAN be known.  They aren't a secret.  Scripture tells us.  Scripture tells us also what happens at death, where everyone "goes" when we die, who the Savior is and who "does" the being saved.

So, if you sit on a pew and you read scriptures which call God and Jesus "Savior" but THEN the pastor tells you that what saves you is a choice and decision YOU make, hopefully, that still, quiet voice will warn you "DANGER!!! DANGER!!! SOMETHING WRONG HERE!!!"

If that intuition kicks in, likely, God is telling you that something isn't right.  When scripture says that God's mercy endures and that God's wrath is but for a moment but THEN, your pastor says that most of creation will be tormented without end, HOPEFULLY, you will see a red flag.

Why do most NOT see a red flag?  As you may have guessed, scripture has the answer for that too!

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; HAVING THEIR CONSCIENCE SEARED WITH A HOT IRON;" (1 Tim.4:1-2)

Hopefully, you haven't heard so much of a FALSE gospel, that you have been inoculated from the TRUE gospel.


Are Christians More Merciful and Just Than God?

I think most Christians would say that we should believe the best about someone (not the worst) and give one the benefit of the doubt.

Yet, when it comes to the question of what God will ultimately do with the overwhelming majority of His creation; Christians believe the worst.  They overwhelmingly believe that He will eternally damn most of His creation.  If there were no scriptures that so much as hinted that God would ultimately save all; I could POSSIBLY see not giving God the benefit of the doubt.  

But we have MANY passages that literally say He is the Savior of all (1 Tim.4:10) that Jesus will draw all men (Jn. 13:32), that all will be reconciled by the blood of the cross (Col.1:20),  that He wills all to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth (1 Tim.2:3-6), that faith is given as a gift by Him (Eph.2:8-9), that every knee will bow and every tongue swear an oath (Isaiah ), that the same all who were condemned in Adam will be justified in Christ (Rom.5:18), etc.
When Christians are faced with the evidence; however, do they give God the benefit of the doubt?  I don't find it.  Instead, I find that most find it "safe" to believe the worst about His justice, fairness, mercy, and ability or desire to save; as if God would be somehow pleased with their less than glowing appraisal of His motives and plan.

Here is the real  issue.  Christians believe that they are MORE merciful than God.  

Christian, if you had the power to SAVE someone/anyone/everyone; would you save them?  If you would, but can't and if you believe God can but won't; are you not more merciful than God in your own mind?

You may ask, "but what about God's justice?"  God judges with righteousness.  I believe in all of the judgments of God described in the scriptures but all of them (by the original Greek and Hebrew words used) both temporal and corrective.  Also, should not the judgment fit the crime?  Does any finite sin call for punishment that is infinite?

Is God fair?  Is God just?  Can He be one without the other?  Being fair is defined as being impartial.  In Acts 10:34, Romans 2:11, and Ephesians 6:9, we learn that God is no respecter of persons.  That means that He deals fairly and is impartial.  One CANNOT be just if one is not also fair.  Consider this when you read what God did to call Saul (Paul) of Tarsus.  Saul was a killer of believers, blasphemer, and chief of ALL sinners, by his own admission.  And yet, Christ (representing His Father) overcame Paul's unbelief with grace, signs, and wonders; giving belief leading to repentance to Paul.  If God would do THESE things to save Paul but will ultimately NOT overcome the unbelief of others to save them; in what way is God NOT a respecter of persons/unfair/unjust when considering the conversion of Paul with the fate of any other unbeliever?


Maybe it is time to reconsider what we think we know.

All Means “All”: Does It?

When it comes to verses like Romans 5:18, 1 Timothy 4:10, John 12:32,  Colossians 1:20, etc that indicate that ALL will be saved; theologians, pastors, and teachers are quick to point out that the Greek word "pas" doesn't always mean "all" (every).  It can mean "as many as" or "many".

Now, the above verses I referenced DO say that all will be saved and reconciled to God.  However, I contend that most Christians don't believe it and don't want to believe it.  They will gladly believe the "all" verses like Romans 3:23 "all have sinned and fallen short..." that say ALL sinners BUT reject the verses that say ALL (same word) will be saved.

Let's look at how scripture is read with a biased viewpoint by most Christians.  Let's consider Romans 5:18:

   "Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for all mankind for condemnation, thus also it is through one just award for all mankind for life's justifying."

Now, the word "all" (pas) which CAN mean "every" or can mean "as many as" is found twice in this one verse. They are separated by a "thus also" making them the same "all" AND making the two groups of "all" affected in the same manner by the actions of the two men.

BUT, Christians say that while all (every) man was affected by Adam; not all (every) man will be affected by Jesus.

This is nothing short of intellectual dishonesty!!!

It should be noted that "all" doesn't always mean "every" but we have to be consistent. 

Let's look at a verse that shows an "all" that doesn't mean "every".

Mark 1:5 says that all were baptized but we KNOW that at least the Pharisees and Sadducees weren't baptized.

So, "all" doesn't always mean   "every"; BUT did you know that you can show (scripturally) that God will save ALL without relying on the word "all" meaning "every"?  

It really boils down to believing:
A. God doesn't lie (Titus 1:2)
 "in expectation of life eonian, which God, Who does not lie, promises before times eonian,"

B.  that if God declares He WILL do something or that something WILL come to pass, it WILL happen (Isaiah 46:10)
      "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:"

C. that it is God's pleasure that all men will be saved (1 Tim.2:3-6).

  "for this is ideal and welcome in the sight of our Saviour, God, 4 Who wills that all mankind be saved and come into a realization of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one Mediator of God and mankind, a Man, Christ Jesus, 6 Who is giving Himself a correspondent Ransom for all (the testimony in its own eras),"

When it comes to the 3 points above there is a real conundrum if you do not believe "all" (every) man will be saved.

If one does not believe point A (God will not lie), it is pointless to discuss B or C.

If one does not believe point B (if God     declares/WILLS something to be; it WILL be); then, point C (He desires all be saved) becomes moot and point A is untrue; making God a liar.

If one does not believe point C (God desires all to be saved), then point B (what God WILLS/declares to be; WILL be) may still be true but point A is untrue (making God a liar).

This isn't a hypothetical or abstract exercise.  It is something that must be considered if you are interested in truth and claim to believe God.

Don't rely on the traditions of men and their creeds.  Don't rely on spurious translations.  Look into what words meant to the writers of scripture.  

In other words, "study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman who need not be ashamed; rightly dividing the word of truth".



Cultural Christianity and Free Will

Most of my scriptural posts and articles contain scripture references.  While I could cite plenty of scripture for my argument, this is an appeal based on logic.

Many will not say, "I am saved because I made a wise decision about Jesus Christ."  That would be an ugly honesty that most will not muster up. After all, Christ is the Savior, but this statement makes it sound as if the sinner saved himself through being smart.  That is just too honest.

Ugly truth or not, the above IS what most Christians think.  Arminians will readily agree that Christ's sacrifice was for all.  They believe THAT.  Ok, then WHAT makes you, Christian, saved; while John Q. Muslim is NOT saved if Jesus' sacrifice was for all people (and it was)?  The salvation of the Christian, versus the condemnation of the Muslim, the Hindu, the Buddhist, or the atheist must be due to the Christian's belief if Jesus' sacrifice was for everyone (and it was). 

So, my question to the HONEST seeker or truth is this:

"Would you be a Christian had you been born in Saudi Arabia (where bibles are illegal)?"

"Would you be a Christian had you been born in the 1200s in China?"

"Would you be a Christian had you been born in the United States and raised by parents who abused you?"

Are you starting to see my point?  

I would argue that had God planted me in Iran, raised by Muslim parents; that I would have been a Muslim as well.

Consider this: You have grown up in the United States as a Christian.  How effective would proselytizing you be, by someone from another country; preaching a belief, foreign to your own?  Is that not what your missionaries do?  Did God place the salvation of the majority of mankind on such a shaky and precarious precipice?

My guess is that given the same character traits, aptitude, and intelligence, your Christian pastor may well have been an Islamic Imam; if only God had chosen to have him born in Saudi Arabia.

Just consider it.  Many of you have seen my articles and posts that use scripture to defend the idea that Christ's work on the cross will bring all (eventually) into a reconciled relationship with The Father.


Consider these logical questions and ask yourself if you believe that God left salvation up to many internal and external influences that would prevent most of the world from ever coming to the truth that God wills all to come to in His timing.

Who Does God Hate?

according as it hath been written, `Jacob I did love, and Esau I did hate.'” (Rom.9:13)
 he who is not loving did not know God, because God is love.” (1 Jn.4:8)
Recently, I sat down and watched a documentary which people had been discussing over the internet.  The documentary is called Hellbound?.  This documentary takes a look at the Christian doctrine of Hell.  Mark Driscoll, founding pastor, of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, Washington is featured in the documentary as a proponent of the eternal conscious torment position on Hell.  Throughout the documentary, Driscoll affirms his belief that the overwhelming majority of humanity will be tormented by God, in Hell for eternity.
That statement, in of itself, did not surprise me, given that this is the commonly held belief in Christendom.  What did surprise me was the shocking honesty which came through in his famous sermon, Jesus Sweats Blood of which a portion was shown in Hellbound?. Driscoll declares, “God hates, right now, personally, objectively, some of you.”  He goes on to say, “Jesus drank every drop of the wrath of God.”
Before I understood from scripture, Christ’s completely successful work on the cross, I would have found Driscoll’s comments to be completely “reasonable”.  I should probably mention that back then, I never bothered to actually study the scriptures for myself, but instead; simply listened to “men of God” (like Driscoll); assuming they actually knew what the “hell” they were talking about.
So, do either of these declarations by Driscoll hold any water when put up against actual scripture?  God declared (see Romans 9:13 above) that He hated Esau.  However, we learn in 1 John 4:8 that “God is love”.  John 3:16 declares that “…God so loved the world…”.  What gives?  God’s “hatred” of Esau…was relative. In the absolute perspective, God loves everyone (including Esau) but in relation to His love for Jacob, God hated Esau.  It may seem unfair, but God does have favorites.  So did Christ.  After all, John was the disciple the Lord loved.  He loved all of the disciples but it appears from scripture that the Apostle, John, was His favorite.  Romans 9:13 is comparative and relative.  

for him who did not know sin, in our behalf He did make sin, that we may become the righteousness of God in him.” (2 Cor.5:21)
The pattern hold thou of sound words, which from me thou didst hear, in faith and love that [is] in Christ Jesus;” (2 Tim.1:13)


Look at the overall context of Romans 9.  Paul, in this chapter of his letter to the Romans, is showing God’s sovereignty in His dealings with man.  This chapter shows for example that it was God, not Pharaoh, Who hardened Pharaoh’s heart.  
What about God’s wrath being poured out on Christ at Calvary?  Christ paid the penalty for sin which we could not pay but that we deserved, becoming sin for us (2 Cor.5:21).  I have heard pastors say for years that “God poured out His wrath on Christ”, that “Christ drank all of God’s wrath”, etc.  However, you will not find that statement, anywhere in scripture.  This is what happens when men hold to man-made creeds and doctrinal statements by adding non-scriptural terms and phrases to build theology.  This gives a distorted and untrue picture of God and His purposes.
Rather than being “…The Savior of all men; especially of thebelievers.” (1 Tim.4:10), He is painted as an angry GodWho wants to “drop the hammer” on us but Christ jumped in the way and took the beating for us.  When you see what the scriptures really say about God and His purposes, we see that God loves us and salvation was His plan before sin even entered the world (Rev.13:8).  See the difference?

 and through him to reconcile the all things to himself -- having made peace through the blood of his cross -- through him, whether the things upon the earth, whether the things in the heavens. And you -- once being alienated, and enemies in the mind, in the evil works, yet now did he reconcile,” (Col. 1:20-21)
Watching Hellbound?Driscoll goes on to say, “Some of you, God hates you. God is sick of you.  God is frustrated with you.  God is wearied by you.  God has suffered long enough with you.  He doesn’t think you’re cute.  He doesn’t think it’s funny.”  
I feel sorry for Mark Driscoll’s “god”.  If his “god” had just decided to be completely sovereign like the true God of the scriptures, he would not be so upset and frustrated with his creatures.  The God of the scriptures operates “all things in accord with the counsel of His will.” (Eph. 1:11).  No one can stay the hand of the God of the scriptures (Dan.4:35).  The problem with Christendom’s “god” is that he decided to give his creatures the ability to thwart his will.  The God of the scriptures did not.  The God of the scriptures declared, “I will do all my pleasure.” (Is.46:10).  Doing all His pleasure includes, getting His way and doing all that He wills.  1Timothy 2:4 declares, God is “Who will have all men to be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth.”  
God’s plan and purposes have always been on track and on schedule all along.  The true God of the scriptures we learn, is completely sovereign, all-knowing, all-powerful, declares the end from the beginning, does all His pleasure, is the Savior of all men, is willing that all be saved and always gets His way.  What is there to worry about?
What of God’s wrath and judgments?  Both are very real but must not be stretched beyond what scripture has to say.  The “sheep and goat judgment” of Matthew 25 is a great example.  Christendom has disregarded the context of what Christ was saying, to whom He was saying it and transformed what is a national judgment into an individual judgment.  In so doing, it has taken salvation (which is all of grace) and turned it into works-based salvation, judged by whether or not individuals feed and hydrate Israelites (Christ’s brethren).  It has also transformed “age-during” benefits or punishment of the nations into “everlasting” benefits or punishment for individuals.  That is a complete twisting of the context all because people fail to rightly divide the Word of Truth” (2Tim.2:15).  

For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life: weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.”(Ps.30:5)
“O, give thanks unto the God of gods: for his mercy endureth for ever.” (Ps.136:2)
We are told in the scriptures, that God’s mercy endures but His anger and wrath are but for a moment.  Is this what Christendom teaches?  According to Mark Driscoll, “If you die apart from Jesus, He will pour out full strength the full cup of that wrath on you forever.”
Driscoll must be talking about the Lake of Fire here.  It lasts “forever” does it not?  Aside from scripture which states that God’s mercy endures but His wrath is only temporary; Driscoll (and the rest of Christendom) must be correct.  After all, if God is going to torment the overwhelming majority of mankind “forever” in the Lake of Fire, surely His wrath must outstretch His mercy.  Driscoll should let God know…
However, a close examination of the Great White Throne Judgment and the Lake of Fire reveals (at least) three distinct things:
1. The words “anger” or “wrath” are not used in connection with the Great White Throne Judgment or the Lake of Fire.
2. The word “torment” is not used in describing the Lake of Fire in connection with humans who are cast into it.  Instead, it is called “the second death”.  Torment is an aspect only for Satan, the Beast and the False Prophet (who just happen to be immortal beings).
3. The Greek word “aion” which means “age” is translated as “ever” by the KJV translators.
Now, before I am accused of heresy or not believing the Word of God, I want to clarify my position.  I believe ALL of scripture from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21.  In addition, I believe in ALL the judgments of God.  However, I try not to stretch words beyond their original meaning in the context, insert Pagan philosophy into words and I do not take passages out of their context.  Consider again the “sheep and goat” judgment of Matthew 25.
I used to believe that those who are cast alive into the Lake of Fire (Rev.20:15, 21:8) are destined to be there forever and ever and ever and ever and ever.  But, is that the end of their story?  Does God hate these people and plan to pour out unending wrath upon them?
With respect to the previous passage which points out several observations about the Lake of Fire, we need to remember the importance of context, word meaning and not imposing preconceived beliefs onto passages of scripture.
First, those in the Body of Christ will not stand before the Great White Throne Judgment.  The Apostle John who wrote Revelation (the only book of the bible where the Great White Throne Judgment and Lake of Fire are found) was an apostle to Israel under the Gospel of the Circumcision.  So, Revelation is to, and about Israel.  If you are a member of the Body of Christ, your apostle is Paul and Revelation does not pertain to you.  It is however, for you in that you learn about God and His plans, purposes and ultimate goal.
Paul never mentions the Great White Throne Judgment or Lake of Fire.  If you are a believer, saved by grace alone through faith alone (Eph.2:8-9) neither of these are anything for you to fear.  
I believe that the Great White Throne Judgment is for Israel and “unbelieving” believers who identify as Israel who will be judged in light of their works (good or bad).  The Lake of Fire will be for those whose names are not found written in The Lamb’s Book of Life and for those who are not “overcomers” (Rev.2:11).
How can someone who is “unbelieving” be a “believer”?  Those in the Body of Christ are justified gratuitously or “freely” (Rom.3:24) and you will only find the cases of unbelieving believers in the Hebrew scriptures and the letters to and about Israel.  In part 7 of his study on the Great White Throne, Dan Sheridan points to Hebrews 3 (written to Hebrew believers) where the author of Hebrews (most likely Paul) admonishes these believers to not have “an evil heart of unbelief”.  Sheridan goes on to say, “Moses was an unbelieving believer. Want proof?  Turn to Numbers 20:12, here is what Jehovah says to Moses, “and the Lord spake to Moses and Aaron, ‘because ye believed not, to sanctify Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.”
Was Moses not saved?  Yes, he was saved but Moses did not partake in the Promised Land due to his unbelief.  This seems to behappening at the Great White Throne in general and the Lake of Fire in particular. 
This judgment is one of works and has nothing to do with salvation or faith.  
 And I saw a great white throne, and Him who is sitting upon it, from whose face the earth and the heaven did flee away, and place was not found for them;12 and I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and scrolls were opened, and another scroll was opened, which is that of the life, and the dead were judged out of the things written in the scrolls -- according to their works;13 and the sea did give up those dead in it, and the death and the hades did give up the dead in them, and they were judged, each one according to their works;14 and the death and the hades were cast to the lake of the fire -- this [is] the second death;15 and if anyone was not found written in the scroll of the life, he was cast to the lake of the fire.” (Rev. 20:11-15)
“and if any one may take away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the scroll of the life, and out of the holy city, and the things that have been written in this scroll;” (Rev.22:19)
Before going further, I have to thank Daniel Sheridan, who through his faithful study of the scriptures, showed me things regarding the Great White Throne, Lake of Fire and the Lamb’s Book of Life that I had never discerned before his study on these topics.  I would encourage anyone who wants to learn in greater depth about these topics, please go to sheridanvoice.com and look for the podcasts on Dan’s series entitled: The Great White Throne parts 1-7.  It is a terrific study.
As with all scripture, we have to look at the context.  Revelation was written by John to the seven Jewish churches in Asia Minor.  This book is to and about Israel and is all about God’s dealing with unfaithful Israel during the Great Tribulation.  Once the Tribulation begins, the dispensation of grace will be over and a short age of wrath will ensue.  But remember, “His anger is but for a moment.”
In Revelation 22:19 we see that people may have their names blotted out of the Lamb’s Book of Life for taking away words from the prophecies contained in Revelation.  However, we learn in Revelation 20:11-15 that names will also be added to the Lamb’s Book of Life.  Just reading the text in our English translations, we will not see this, but we are told that the Book of Life will get larger during the Great White Throne Judgment.  Thanks again to Dan Sheridan for his study on this.
If you will look at “scroll” in verse 15 of chapter 20, the Greek word “biblos” (Strong’s #G976) was used.  However, when you see “scroll” in verse 11, the Greek word “biblion” (Strong’s #G975) was used.  “Biblion” is a smaller “biblos”.  You will need a concordance to find this distinction because the word “scroll” or “book” is used in English translations and no distinction is made to size.  When looking at a Greek interlinear text of this passage, you can see the distinction in the text.  You will see the word “scrollet” used in verse 11 and “scroll” used in verse 15.
So, as works are judged, names are actually added to the Book of Life.  The Book gets larger.  I think there will be more added to the Book of Life and less cast into the Lake of Fire.
If this judgment is specific to Israel (as I now tend to believe it is) and those who are not “overcomers”, where are all the unbelieving heathen judged?  While we are not told specifically, it may well happen on Earth during the time of the New Heavens and New Earth according to Job 19:25-29.
What about the Lake of Fire itself?  Here, I am limiting my detailed comments to the subject of humans and the Lake of Fire.  I am excluding for purposes of this article:  Satan, the Beast and False Prophet.
We know that the Lake of Fire is subsequent to the Great White Throne Judgment.  Those who are not found in the Lamb’s Book of Life; are cast into the Lake of Fire.  We are not told the duration of the Lake of Fire, but we are told that it is not “without end”.  I will cover that later.
When you read carefully the passages discussing the Lake of Fire (regarding humans) you will not find the words “torment” or “torture”.  Unfortunately, these terms are inserted into the context by doctrines and the teaching of men; not scripture.  What you will find is that it is referred to as the “second death”.  This sounds foolish to have to elaborate on but we must, due to the fact that Christianity has so “paganized” the concept of what “death” is and what it is not.  Death is the absence of life.  Deep down we know this but we have also been terribly brainwashed by religious orthodoxy.  Death is not “life” somewhere else.  What do the scriptures say about death? Most importantly, we learn that the soul is not immortal.
“and of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou dost not eat of it, for in the day of thine eating of it -- dying thou dost die.'” (Gen.2:17)
“The soul that doth sin -- it doth die...” (Ez.18:20)
“For the living know that they die, and the dead know not anything…” (Ecc.9:5)
“Men, brethren! it is permitted to speak with freedom unto you concerning the patriarch David, that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is among us unto this day;” (Acts. 2:29)
There is NO hope in death.  Our hope is in Christ resurrecting us to immortality.  “Death” is not “life” nor is it a euphemism for eternal torment.  We cannot stretch words beyond what they mean or ascribe meanings to them beyond the context and arrive at a sound doctrinal belief.
Those who are resurrected to face the Great White Throne Judgment, and are cast into the Lake of Fire are raised to mortality(think of Lazarus in John 11:1-12:20) not immortality.  Those cast into the Lake of Fire must be raised to mortality or else, how can they die a second time?  One, who is immortal, cannot die.  
While we are not told how long those who are cast into the Lake of Fire (the second death) will be dead, I believe it will be a long time.  How do we know that it does not last forever?  Doesn’t the bible teach that the Lake of Fire lasts “forever and ever”?  In the passages referring to humans and the Lake of Fire, no reference as to duration is made.  In the passages speaking of Satan, the Beast and False Prophet, the word “aion” is used twice “aion aion”.  From this, the KJV translates this as ‘forever and ever”.  The meaning of “aion” however is not “without end”, “forever”, “eternity”, etc.  The word “aion” actually means “age” and is the word which we transliterate the English word “eon”.  There are a few bible translations which translate this word correctly and consistently.  Young’s Literal Translation and the Concordant Literal Translation are two of these.  The King James Version and many subsequent translations do not translate correctly nor consistently when it comes to “aion”.  Let’s look at Matthew 28:20 to show an example of what I mean.  Keep in mind that the Greek word “kosmos” means “world” and the Greek word “aion” means “age”.
“teaching them to observe all, whatever I did command you,) and lo, I am with you all the days -- till the full end of the age.” (YLT)
“Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” (KJV)
The highlighted word in both examples given above was originally “aion” in the Greek.  So, if the KJV translators had translated “aion consistentlythey would have rendered it as “forever”.  But that would not have made sense, so they rendered it “world”.  The preceding is an example of translating with a doctrinal bias.  

“ for since through man [is] the death, also through man [is] a rising again of the dead,  for even as in Adam all die, so also in the Christ all shall be made alive, and each in his proper order, a first-fruit Christ, afterwards those who are the Christ's, in his presence, then -- the end, when he may deliver up the reign to God, even the Father, when he may have made useless all rule, and all authority and power -- for it behoveth him to reign till he may have put all the enemies under his feet -- the last enemy is done away -- death;  for all things He did put under his feet, and, when one may say that all things have been subjected, [it is] evident that He is excepted who did subject the all things to him,  and when the all things may be subjected to him, then the Son also himself shall be subject to Him, who did subject to him the all things, that God may be the all in all.” (1 Cor. 15:21-28)
At this point, you may be saying, “ok, maybe “aion” doesn’t mean “without end”, but we do not know anything about those cast into the Lake of Fire beyond what is said in Revelation 21:8.”  While Revelation is the final book in scripture and chapter 22 says nothing further about them, we do see beyond this point in 1 Corinthians 15:21-28.  This takes place just prior to the consummation of time.  
The Apostle Paul was given revelations by Christ, beyond what was given to the “12” including John.  The above passage is as far into the future as God has chosen to reveal to us in scripture.  This passage is packed with remarkable and exciting information.
Verse 22 is much like Romans 5:18.  Both passages talk about Adam and Christ heading-up humanity.  Adam’s offense had its universal effect on humanity.  No Christian I know of, disputes this fact.  When it comes to Adam’s sin and all of humanity falling under the curse and penalty through no act of their own, everyone seems to be in agreement.  However, no Christian I know of, believes that Christ’s act of righteousness affects the same “all” referenced under Adam’s act even though this is clearly what scripture says.  The “so also” between the two segments of the verse, acts as a literary “equal sign”.  The fact is, the same “all” who die because of Adam are the same “all” who will be vivified (made immortal) through Christ.
Verse 23 shows that all will be made alive, but “each in his proper order”.  Not everyone will be resurrected to immortality at the same time.  First, those who are members of the Body of Christ (both living and dead) will be snatched away and made immortal (1Thess.4:15-17 and 1 Cor.15:51-55), then at Christ’s second coming, those who are members of the Bride will be resurrected (Rev.20:4-6) to immortality as part of Christ’s millennial reign.  
Verses 24-28 are very interesting and much takes place in these short, five verses of scripture.  These passages take us in time from Christ’s 1,000 year reign, all the way through the final age of time known as the New Heavens and New Earth (2 Pet.3:10-13).
This is extraordinary because what do we read will happen in 1 Corinthians 15:26?  Christ will finally abolish the final enemy which is death.  The only death existing during this place in time is those who are still dead; not having been resurrected to immortality yet.  Now that we know that “death’ is not “life” somewhere else, and that the Lake of Fire is literally, the “second death”, we can understand what it means when Christ will abolish death once and for all.  
In verse 28, we see (at the end of time) that through Christ’s work, God will become “all in all”.  Not “all” in “some” or “all” in a very “few”.  Knowing this truth, allows us to believe the passages which teach that Christ is a successful Savior and not a potential Savior.  It allows us to believe all of scripture and see that Christ truly did “finish” the work of salvation as the cross.  
on the morrow John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, `Lo, the Lamb of God, who is taking away the sin of the world;”(Jn.1:29)
and I, if I may be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto myself.”(Jn.12:32)
for the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.” (Luk.19:10)
“-and to him who is not working, and is believing upon Him who is declaring righteous the impious, his faith is reckoned -- to righteousness” (Rom.4:5)
“So, then, as through one offence to all men [it is] to condemnation, so also through one declaration of `Righteous' [it is] to all men to justification of life” (Rom.5:18)
how that God was in Christ -- a world reconciling to Himself, not reckoning to them their trespasses; and having put in us the word of the reconciliation,” (2Cor.5:19)
for by grace ye are having been saved, through faith, and this not of you -- of God the gift, not of works, that no one may boast;” (Eph.2:8-9)
because in him it did please all the fulness to tabernacle, and through him to reconcile the all things to himself -- having made peace through the blood of his cross -- through him, whether the things upon the earth, whether the things in the heavens. And you -- once being alienated, and enemies in the mind, in the evil works, yet now did he reconcile,” (Col.1:19-21)
And you -- being dead in the trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh -- He made alive together with him, having forgiven you all the trespasses, having blotted out the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us, that was contrary to us, and he hath taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross;” (Col.2:13-14)
for for this we both labour and are reproached, because we hope on the living God, who is Saviour of all men -- especially of those believing.” (1 Tim.4:10)
So, does God hate anyone?  From my studies of scripture and my faith in Christ and God’s plan of salvation to redeem man and bring glory to Himself, I have to say “no”.  
If the concept that God will save all men through no effort of their own but through Christ’s work on the cross is foreign to you, I suggest the following:
➢ First, pray that the Holy Spirit will lead you into truth.
➢ Do a word study on “hell”.  Look at the one Hebrew word (in the Old Testament) translated as “hell” in most versions.
➢ When studying the occurrences of these words ask yourself this:  “if hell means eternal torment, then where would people in the Hebrew scriptures have gotten that idea?”  God warned of “death” as the penalty for sin.  Moses (as well as the other prophets) warned of “death” and other earthly penalties for sin, not eternal torment.
➢ Do a word study on the Greek words translated as “hell” in the New Testament.  Hint:  when Christ uses the word “hell”, go back to Isaiah 66:24 to see what He was talking about.
➢ Do a similar study of the words “ever”, “eternal’, “everlasting”, “forever”, “eternity”.
➢ Be sure to rightly divide scripture (2 Tim.2:15), taking note of who is speaking, to whom it is being said, what is being said and what comes before and follows after.
Be as the Bereans and study the scriptures to see if these things are so.